ORIGINAL MLAI TEACHING DECK — ENTIRELY FICTIONAL
29 October 2026

 A seven-slide teaching outline Original MLAI teaching deck, entirely fictional. This text-first outline uses the quote-drafting example below. Each slide includes the limit a reader must retain; it is not a funded founder deck or customer case study. Purpose: “Review-only quote drafts for equipment hire.” Ask for feedback on the proposed workflow, not an investment commitment. Problem: the assumed difficulty is preparing consistent drafts. Label it a hypothesis; no customer interviews or market-size evidence are supplied. Current alternative: a staff member uses approved prices and a template. Do not claim competitors are absent or the manual method is worse without a comparison. Proposed solution: create a draft for staff review, with no live integration or sending. A mock-up demonstrates an idea, not reliability. Evidence: twenty invented timing rows total 200 baseline minutes and 190 assisted minutes including setup. The 10-minute difference is illustrative; no cash saving or accuracy rate was measured. Unknowns: real task frequency, willingness to pay, software costs, upkeep and representative quality. Include the four scripted corrections as failure examples. Next request: ask a consenting workflow owner whether this is a relevant problem and what would justify a bounded test. A positive conversation would not establish demand or approval to deploy. Download the original slide outline and filled evidence checklist , then use the claim worksheet for your own source-backed version.

FILLED EVIDENCE CHECKLIST
Audience/request: workflow-owner feedback, not investment.
Problem: hypothesis; no customer research supplied.
Product: proposed draft-only workflow; no integration or deployment.
Timing claim:20 invented rows;200 baseline minutes,190 assisted including 50 setup;10-minute / 5% illustration, not cash saving or causation.
Failure material:4 scripted corrections; no model accuracy estimate.
Demand: unknown; no invoices, paid accounts or retention.
Costs: software/maintenance/other work omitted.
Permission: original text, no third-party deck assets or customer material.
Next check: consenting owner discussion; separately agree bounded pilot evidence.
Decision: do not present this as a real company result.

Full worksheet: https://mlai.au/downloads/pitch-deck-evidence-review.txt