Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not legal or technical advice. For official guidelines on the safe and responsible use of AI, please refer to the Australian Government’s Guidance for AI Adoption →
Key facts: How technology affects education negatively
Brief, factual overview referencing current Australian context.
What are the main negative effects of classroom technology?
Distraction, shallow learning from multitasking, equity gaps, privacy/security risks, and extra teacher workload.
Does screen time harm learning outcomes?
Excessive or unfocused use links to lower recall and sleep issues; structured, time‑bound tasks mitigate risk.
How can schools reduce tech distractions?
Set device norms, disable notifications, use timed single‑task blocks, and measure impact against non‑tech lessons.
How technology affects education negatively — This isn’t an anti-tech view; it’s a practical look at the downsides that show up in real classrooms. Used without clear purpose or guardrails, devices and apps can erode attention, add workload, and widen equity gaps. This guide summarises the key risks and shares simple ways Australian schools can reduce harm.
Devices can help or hinder. Purpose and classroom norms matter most.
Who is this guide for?
Teachers & school leaders
Practical checks to reduce distraction, risk, and workload.
Parents & carers
What to ask schools and how to support healthy screen habits.
IT & EdTech teams
Privacy, security, and platform choices that minimise friction.
What the evidence actually says (Australia)
Australian sources such as AITSL highlight a consistent theme: technology can support learning when it is tightly aligned to a clear objective and well-implemented, but the evidence for broad, unbounded use is mixed. The opportunity cost is real — time spent on tech activities that don’t improve learning displaces proven practices like retrieval and feedback.
Key insight
Start with the learning outcome, not the tool. If a device or app doesn’t clearly improve practice or evidence collection, don’t use it.
Distraction and attention costs
Multitasking (e.g., tab switching, chat) reduces recall and slows progress. Notifications, infinite-scroll feeds, and frictionless switching make sustained attention harder. These effects are strongest during note-taking and conceptual learning, where deep processing is required.
Classroom norms that help
Use explicit cues (screens-down/screens-up), single-task windows, and app/site blocking where appropriate. Run short, time-boxed digital tasks with visible timers and defined outputs; then close laptops to debrief.
Quick win
Make \"purpose + product\" explicit before devices open: what students will make and how you will check it.
Screen time, sleep, and wellbeing
Excess, late-night, or unfocused screen use is associated with sleep disruption and mood issues. During school hours, aim for purposeful, time-limited tasks with regular movement and off-screen breaks. Coordinate classroom expectations with home guidance so students get consistent messages.
Equity and access: the digital divide
BYOD and app-heavy programs can entrench inequality when families lack reliable devices, repairs, or broadband. Regional and remote contexts face extra hurdles (coverage, bandwidth costs, device servicing). Hidden costs — chargers, logins, consumables, time — can undermine inclusion.
Reduce inequity in daily practice
Provide loan pools, use offline-first resources, and standardise a small toolset across subjects. Prefer low-bandwidth options and printable alternatives where appropriate.
Privacy, security, and AI-specific risks
Student data can be sensitive. Schools should review data flows, storage locations, and vendor retention policies, and align practice with the Australian Privacy Principles. Generative AI adds new risks: exposure of personal information, opaque model behaviour, biased outputs, and academic integrity concerns.
Minimum checks before adopting a tool
Require SSO, role-based permissions, a Data Processing Agreement, and a clear retention policy. Avoid tools that require student personal accounts when institution logins are available. Set clear classroom AI rules (what’s allowed, what must be student-original).
Teacher workload and platform sprawl
Fragmented platforms multiply logins, notifications, and admin tasks. Without tidy processes, tech increases workload rather than reducing it. Standardise the minimum set of tools, provide short PD focused on classroom routines, and remove rarely-used apps.
Shallow learning and over-reliance on automation
Automation (including AI) can short-circuit productive struggle. If tasks are easily completed by a chatbot, students may skip retrieval and reasoning. Favour prompts and products that require explanation, critique, or synthesis — and collect process evidence (drafts, oral checks, reflections).
Mitigate the risks in your context
1Define a learning goal and success measure for any tech use
If you can’t describe how the tool improves learning — and how you’ll know — it probably shouldn’t be in the lesson.
📝
Free MLAI Template Resource
Download our comprehensive template and checklist to structure your approach systematically. Created by the MLAI community for Australian startups and teams.
Technology should earn its place. Use it when it clearly helps students learn, when it protects their data, and when it doesn’t add unnecessary workload. Start small, measure, and keep what works.
UNESCO • Global synthesis on the promises and pitfalls of technology in education.
Analysis
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not legal or technical advice. For official guidelines on the safe and responsible use of AI, please refer to the Australian Government’s Guidance for AI Adoption →
Need help with How technology affects education negatively?
MLAI is a not-for-profit community supporting Australia's AI practitioners and educators. Get practical recommendations based on your goals and context.
Sam leads the MLAI editorial team, combining deep research in machine learning with practical guidance for Australian teams adopting AI responsibly.
AI-assisted drafting, human-edited and reviewed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does technology reduce students' attention in class?
It can. Multitasking (switching between tabs/apps) is linked to lower recall and slower task completion. Setting device norms (e.g., notifications off, single-task windows) reduces this risk.
How much screen time is too much for learning?
There's no one-size number. Focus on quality and purpose: time-bound, curriculum-aligned tasks with breaks. For younger students, prioritise off-screen activities and sleep hygiene.
What practical steps cut distraction during laptop use?
Use clear cues (\"screens down\" / \"screens up\"), disable notifications, prefer full-screen apps, seat students so screens are visible, and run short digital blocks with explicit outcomes.
Does BYOD widen the digital divide?
It can if not managed. Provide loan devices, offline-first resources, low-bandwidth options, and consistent platforms. Budget for repairs, chargers, and connectivity in regional contexts.
Are AI tools a cheating risk?
Yes if tasks are easily auto-completed. Use process-focused assessment (drafts, orals, reflections), set AI-use policies, and teach AI literacy and integrity.
What privacy checks should schools do before adopting an app?
Confirm data location and retention, review the privacy policy, seek a Data Processing Agreement, enable SSO, restrict permissions by role, and follow Privacy Act (Cth) obligations.
